Because of the prevailing myths in the society that equate desiring men with 'female inside male,' the effeminate males (third genders) who like men conveniently confuse their femininity with their sexuality for men, since the former is not acknowledged by western society as 'scientific' or 'biological,' but the latter "sexuality for men" is recognized by the western society, albeit, as a disease or an anomaly.

For the effeminate male who likes men, his sexuality for men indeed flows from the female inside of him. For him the two, femininity and sexuality for men are inseparable. The society recognizes only his sexuality for men, and not his femininity. The femininity is supposed to be part of his sexuality for men.

The reason why the effeminate male that likes men, created a separate category of 'homosexual' was because he needed a separate male gender category to accomodate his femininity (which he confuses with his sexuality for men). However, the male with a strong male identity that likes men hates nothing in this world more than to break from the mainstream, men's identity, where manhood and men's spaces lie. The last thing he wants is to be broken from other men, and be categorized with the third genders. The effeminate male wants nothing more than to break off from the men's category and from manhood, and create a feminine space for himself, where he can really be himself 'homosexual.'

The effeminate male by creating a 'homosexual' category has sought to break any man who acknowledges his sexuality for men, to be broken from men and to be categorized along with the effeminates. While this greatly takes away the space for the masculine gendered, 'straight' identified male from liking other men, and thus breaks men from men and disempower them, the effeminate male as 'gay' is immensely and unduly empowered by this loss and persecution of men. He gets 'ownership' of the 'man who like men' trait (when it doesn't belong to him at all, since he is not a 'man' in the traditional sense of the term).

Since, the western society, ruled by anti-man forces, bent upon breaking men from men validated the self-definition of the effeminate male as

Gender orientation is biological, Sexual orientation is a social construct

It is ridiculous that westerners can't really comprehend the concept of Third Gender. They define third gender in terms of gender roles. That is, third sex for them is just a social construct, that has no natural basis.

While the same Westerners, do not consider 'sexual orientation' to be a social construct, when so many scholars in their own culture have been shouting themselves hoarse that 'sexual orientation' is a social construct.

The West is wrong here, and can be proven so... Gender is natural, it is 'sexual orientation' that is a Social construct.

Lord Ram predicted that Heterosexuality will rule one day

Lord Ram had once told the half-males/ half-females that one day you will rule the world... and indeed, in heterosexuality, we have the queer human trait ruling the world -- the heterogendered.

..

Homosexuality refers to a Queer male's sexual attraction for men

The fact that homosexuality and (a) queerness and/ or (b) receptive anal/ oral sex is used interchangebly as one and the same thing, is a clear pointer that homosexuality basically represents these traits, and not any male sexual interest in men.

Queers who have sex with men vs. MSM

But even when the "Queer = receptive anal/ oral sex" is not naturally correct, it doesn't mean that there is no natural difference between Queers-who-have-sex-with-men and (Straight) Men-who-have-sex-with-men. It doesn't mean that their difference is just socially orchestrated. They are different to the core, but their difference constitutes of their Genders. The Queers are feminine gendered males, while Men are masculine gendered males.

The problem is with males who are inbetween queers and 'men' -- i.e. the meterosexuals, and it depends upon them where they want to be -- whether with the queers or with the men.

Scientific studies are bluffs

If I were to study a queer heterosexual as the sample for straight with women, don't you think I will come with the conclusion that that heterosexuals have brain structures similar to women, and they walk differently than masculine gendered males (men)?